In order to give you a “glimpse behind the scenes” of our product development, our R&D guys share their discoveries and developments with you in the “Tech Section”. The information can vary from recent developments to useful “tricks & tips” on getting the best out of your Alcons system.
 
    
 
 
 
       
  introduction   
it’s only natural... »
the RBN family of pro-ribbon drivers »
the pro-ribbon driver’s advantages »
alcons pro-ribbon driver vs. 2” compression driver »
cylindrical wavefront not a “fit-to-function” solution »
the L-series ribbon line-array modules »
the alcons ribbon line-array’s advantages »
the ribbon network »
how to evaluate a line-array in the field? »


  download as pdf
  Line-arrays, although not new, seem to be the latest “flavour of the month” in sound reinforcement. And indeed, a line-array can offer significant advantages in throw and control, when designed correctly.

The biggest advantage of a (well designed) line-array is the efficiency and relative simplicity of the sound system, in providing SPL and coverage control over a defined area.
For a line-array (basically “an array of line sources”), a true cylindrical wave front is the (only) key to a good working line-array system and many attempts are being made to create this type of wave front with traditional compression drivers.

The main criteria for getting a well designed array, is to get all drivers working together, instead of working against each other. Since each frequency has a different wave-length, the secret to “summing” is that the sources/speakers must be closely coupled, with a distance less than half a wavelength of the highest frequency they have to reproduce.

For low frequencies this is no problem, where the size of the speaker is well within “half of the wavelength”. The real challenge is in mid and high frequencies; Here the physical size of the speaker is too big for its wavelength, resulting in individual point sources instead of a seamless cylindrical wavefront.

If we calculate half of the wavelength with the formula “Wavelength = Speed of sound divided by Frequency”, we can see that for correct summing, a frequency of 20.000 Hz, should be reproduced by a transducer not bigger than 8,6mm.. Knowing that (one of) the smallest HF speakers measures 24mm (so effective up to 4,1kHz), it is clear that this is not possible. Taking half the frequency (10kHz.), the required speaker size is still only 17,2mm. And we didn’t even mention usable SPL with a speaker this size…!

 

no coherent waveform possible


The only possibility of getting correct summing at these frequencies, is to generate/simulate an cylindrical/ Isophase wavefront.

One can thus try to transform a point source (dome tweeter, compression driver) into an isophase/cylindrical wavefront (as done by every manufacturer in more or less successful way), but this will be done at the expense of substantially decrease of sound quality; The waveguides necessary for this, introduce a further increased distortion as result of reflection and compression, as induced by the channelled sound waves.

In combination with a generally used compression driver (that isn’t exactly known for its uncoloured, distortion- free high transient response to begin with…) this leads to a very bad “signal-to-noise” (S/N) ratio.

Taking the above-mentioned negative side-effects into account, one would ideally like to start with an “instant” isophase wavefront, instead of going through this “creative plumbing” ……
       
      next page »